Friday, 1 February 2013

CCCB or Papa Ratzinger; Whom do you believe?


With a hat-tip to Kitchener-Waterloo Traditional Catholic for the good work on Jadot's boys, comes this story which I've long forgotten about:

"On January 18, 1991, Bishop Joseph Ferrario, the local Ordinary of Honolulu (now deceased), served them [six SSPX priests] a Formal Canonical Warning, threatening them with excommunication.  On May 1, 1991, they were formally declared to be excommunicated


In a letter dated June 28, 1993, the USA's Apostolic Pro-Nunico, Archbishop Cacciavillan, declared on Cardinal Ratzinger's behalf:

From the examination of the case, conducted on the basis of the Law of the Church, it did not result that the facts referred to in the above-mentioned decree are formal schismatic acts in the strict sense, as they do not constitute the offense of schism; and therefore the Congregation holds that the Decree of May 1, 1991 lacks foundation and hence validity.

This is a declaration that the automatic (ipso facto) excommunication claimed by Bishop Ferrario for the followers of Archbishop Lefebvre is in fact totally non-existent."


On January 17, commenting on the inappropriate comments by Bishop Fellay, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops the Society of Saint Pius X, to be a schismatic group not in communion with the Catholic Church.

So which is it? 

Who are we to believe?

Is the SSPX schismatic as the CCCB states or is it not as then Cardinal Ratzinger declared in 1991?

For more on Bishop Ferrario, how about this little gem from Randy Engel's, The Rite of Sodomy:
Meanwhile, Ferrario was moving up the ecclesiastical ladder. In 1978, Pope Paul VI appointed him an Auxiliary Bishop of Honolulu, and in 1982, Pope John Paul II elevated Ferrario to Bishop of Honolulu. This despite the fact that Ferrario was engaged in sexual solicitation of seminarians at St. Stephen's and had carried on a homosexual liaison with another island priest. Word spread that the Diocese of Honolulu was now overtly "gay friendly."
KWTC refers in the same editorial to Raymond Leahy and Barry Glendinning, two homosexual pederasts, bishop and priest, who were known as expert "liturgists." How often has this been revealed; that those who those who persecute and denigrate the traditional liturgy and those who even take it upon themselves to put their personal mark on the new liturgy are themselves, homosexuals or sympathizers.

It is the height of narcissism and deceit and betrayal and disgust.

Oh, in case my enemies are reading, I'm not blogging from work - taking a vacation day.

4 comments:

Freyr said...

The CCCB has no authority whatsoever and the press release on the CCCB site was unsigned. A press release is not any kind of authoritative document but merely a trial balloon of sorts. Its purpose is to manipulate public opinion or just see what kind of reaction it gets. Any sane person would wait for an authoritative pronouncement from the curia.

Anonymous said...

Most people believe the CCCB *IS* the curia because they don't know any better. Because they are told any different by those who know the difference....

capebretoner

Barona said...

The CCCB are not counting on sanity... just look at the Winnipeg Statement for starters. Just look at their economic statements during the 80s...

Mike Krupa said...

Just a nice aside about the "schismatic" character of the FSSPX. At the end of a First Friday Mass and Benediction, which I attended last Friday, the entire congregation of the local Toronto FSSPX chapel, led by Fr. Boulet, recited a latin prayer for the Holy Father Benedict XVI. Sounds strangely "un-schismatic" to me :)

Mike Krupa